Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Normal_gaussian's commentslogin

I'm in the UK. I have several bank accounts, both personally and for business.

For my four personal accounts my last email was last October, and the one before that was last July.

For my business accounts I have most set to email me a statement every month (automations attached).


I wonder if there is some sort of regulation specific to the UK that stops them.

A whole load of banking products aren't legal in the UK, or are highly regulated; particularly sludge products which are easy to sign up for but hard to cancel.

UK banks are required to make their communications easy to understand and relevant. There are also regulations requiring banks to tell users when products may be unsuitable.

All UK companies have to adhere to the UK GDPR, which allows users to restrict what marketing can reach them.

So yes - a bunch of regulations.


I have a professional 'homelab' and a personal 'homelab'. You're 100% right, they can be a time sink. The important bit is to make sure the time is setup not 'maintenance' time.

The trick is twofold: if it isn't 'declare and deploy' don't run it. If it isn't in your backup/restore pipeline don't run it.

Pfsense and Home assistant are huge pains in the ass. Everything else is easy breezy.

Proxmox/pbs/truenas/talos/linstor/DRBD are all amazing.

I'm thinking about ditching pfsense for tailscale/cloudflare tunnels, but it's not worth the time atm. I don't have a viable alternative for HA.


Out of curiosity, what makes Home Assistant a pain?

It can be easier to hack the device and patch it than determine which device it is. This is nearly always true for the non-technical, but it is true for most technical people as well. Many of the devices in peoples homes that aren't being actively patched are not that old!

Electron is NodeJS + Chromium + Some native control APIs (trays/menus/shortcuts/window management) + update & packaging.

So a lot more can be done with an electron app, while still staying mostly in the web based comfort zone.



It's called Claude. Or Gemini-cli. Or any other agent capable of running man.

"Hey <agent>, use `man` to help answer these questions about grep"


https://animal.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/Eating-Awa...

This covers moving the UK to self-sustain by reducing animal products and repurposing animal feed cropland to direct consumption cropland; it also covers reforestation.

So while it isn't possible today, its possible to become possible without relying on any technological advancements.


Farmland is ~69% of the total area of the UK with it being quite stable in the last decade, and most of that being grassland. Solar accounts for ~0.1% of (former) agricultural land, and after 2030 it should be around ~0.6%. The Land Use Framework aims for 1% of land (mainly agricultural, so ~1.5% of ag) for renewables by 2050. Housing doesn't have as comparable figures, but I'm envelope mathing it to about 1.5% by 2050 again. Which makes 3% of ag land, of which crops are roughly 1/3rd, and google says 60% of solar is on good crop land. So a reduction of up to ~6% at the top end.

There are a few flip-sides here - things that many don't like to hear or acknowledge:

There are alternate diets that are suitably nutritious that are achievable on this land, largely by reducing meat consumption. Meat production uses much more land than other food sources, and a lot of that is input crops. Its inefficient. A change in diet can make the UK self-sufficient on much less land.

Solar is a developing technology; it will improve, requiring less land for the same production. If long term trends push up the value of crops and down solar production, the panels can be removed and crops grown instead - its either/or but it is reversible. This is especially important for bringing in non-solar power sources which take longer to realise (nuclear, tidal). I will also note that solar farms are built on the good crop land because it is convenient and the price is right. We will see south facing hills covered soon enough.

Housing and social housing are the same problem; where housing prices are so high compared to salaries, social housing demand increases. Building houses - any houses - solves the problem. The question of density, location, style is a question about what kind of problems we want in 10-20 years time. High rises did not work well at all.


Its unclear whether there is sufficient human authorship in cc for copyright to stick on a court. Anthropics arguments would hinge on the curation of plans and the direction decisions, which haven't been properly tested as the source of authorship yet. Typically contracted implementers sign over copyright to the project owners, and this is where there is case law.

The policy is https://docs.npmjs.com/policies/unpublish

    Packages published less than 72 hours ago
    
    For newly created packages, as long as no other packages in the npm Public Registry depend on your package, you can unpublish anytime within the first 72 hours after publishing.
There are 231+ packages that depend on this one, and I imagine they mostly use permissive enough version ranges that this was included.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: