Every browser gives me a different result, I guess I can't blame the site for that. But it should perhaps mention which browser would be the most accurate.
Memory bandwidth is completely different on any browser from measured results on my M2 Pro machine. Weirdly, the estimated performance levels and even exact product name differ between Chrome and Firefox. Firefox calls it an M2 Pro and overshoots measured memory bandwidth by 40GB/S, Chrome calls it an "Apple M2 Pro" and overshoots by 80.
They've published a series of articles on this project:
>So this is how a lot of our assets ended up being primarily designed in real life as painted paper-cutout models. The models are then photographed, taken apart and scanned. Some paint samples are also created specifically to become tileable.
I find it insane that everybody is seemingly okay with the fact that websites get to know what a user was browsing before landing on their site. And that there's no straightforward way to disable this behavior without the use of extensions.
