Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sounds's commentslogin

I second the other commenters, and recommend watching the linked videos.

General Relativity and Entropy have not yet been unified into a single theory. In the meantime, gravity always takes priority over entropy. Or in other words, physicists don't yet know how gravity could make entropy slower or faster, so gravity ignores entropy and entropy just has to deal with whatever happens within the gravitational field.

A spaceship in a strong gravity field would not know their time was any different. Someone outside the field would give them a different relative measurement. But inside the field, entropy is not slower and not faster, because the spaceship doesn't see any change in the speed of their own clocks, even if they hear from someone else that their clocks are going at a different speed.

Good luck!


Not all cash is fungible for CapEx. For instance, much of that might hypothetically be held in an offshore account. Building a datacenter with it would trigger unfavorable VAT or sales tax or something... Hypothetically...

High cap companies use debt for this: bank loan is located in the market where it's needed most, and the debt is serviced by interest earned from securities in other markets. The net taxes are a small percent (think 3%) relative to simply transferring funds within the company. Yes, this is the low effective tax rate the EU is quite upset about.

Other reasons for not touching their holdings usually have a similar explanation. The securities are fungible for accounting purposes but not fungible enough for actual day-to-day operations. Result: securities get "stranded" and the large company grows a hedge fund appendage.


Yeah, for profitable companies, debt is a strategic tool not a desperate act. It more about orchestrating around the money that is soft locked somewhere else.

Please keep in mind this sudden burst of legislation is because Facebook recently faced a combined $1.1 billion fine for intentionally harming children. The judgment took years.

New Mexico Child Safety Case ($375 Million) was an actual judgment.

US class-action privacy lawsuit was a $725 million settlement, with no judgment.

These laws were proposed as soon as it was clear Facebook would not win. They move the liability to the Operating System, exempting Facebook.


Is there any additional info on where it was "published publicly by an unrelated third party"? From the timeline in the writeup:

> 2026-05-07: Submitted detailed information about the vulnerability and the exploit to the linux-distros mailing list. The embargo was set to 5 days, with an agreement that if a third party publishes the exploit on the internet during the embargo period, the Dirty Frag exploit would be published publicly.

> 2026-05-07: Detailed information and the exploit for this vulnerability were published publicly by an unrelated third party, breaking the embargo.

Edit: nevermind, details are further down in the thread:

https://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/07/12

And

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48055863


People are blaming the guy who wrote the exploit for breaking the embargo but it was actually broken in Linux by publishing a fix [1]:

> on 2026-05-05 Steffen Klassert pushed f4c50a4034 to netdev/net.git with Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org.

Once a fix is out it's usual for researchers to race to make the first exploit out of it.

[1] https://afflicted.sh/blog/posts/copy-fail-2.html


This is an interesting thought exercise. I immediately thought of the counter argument that Apple's driver quality is worse, especially for laptops nearing end of life (for the sake of argument assume this were true).

Could I then submit a warranty claim and demand Apple replace my aging laptop with their latest model?


Question: did the hints given at https://frame.work/nextgen include any secret messages you want the public to know about? Maybe the secret was missed during the run up to today?


Bank is saying it doesn't want your money, correct?


Didn't they announce they were selling it off a while back? I thought the reason was it's not very much like the other things Google does.


> I just don't know if the human capital is there.

> At my job we use HyperV, and finding someone who actually knows HyperV is difficult and expensive...

Try offering significantly higher pay.


Or even try to educate people. It was common to have learning programs but nowadays managers only complain you cannot find cheap experts.


"We educated the people and they left because they could get better elsewhere" - Some Manager


Samsung seems to be targetting a sweet spot. "Costs less than Apple, superficially looks like an iPhone, product lineup includes smaller form factors, good enough."

It doesn't work for me, but that's because I courageously use my headphone jack.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: