>if they're rational (an assumption that is debatable, of course)
Feels like crime is an almost perfect simulation of the free market: almost/ all of the non-rational actors will be crowded out by evolutionary pressure to be better at finding the highest expected values, where EV would be something like [difficulty to break in] x [best-guess value of access].
This is a total tangent. However note that the creator of the ‘free market’ idea, Adam Smith, wasn’t an advocate for zero law/regulation regulation.
In fact Chapter 10 of his “Wealth of Nations,” specifically states, “When the regulation, therefore, is in favour of the work-men, it is always just and equitable.” He goes on to explain that regulation that benefits the masters can wind up being unjust.
Smith’s concept of ‘laissez-faire’ was novel back in the day. But by today’s standards, some of his economic opinions might even be considered “collectivist.”
Other than you seeing a thing you want to see, why? There’s a pretty well known story behind that. Also, this post was written by a mensch, so have some respect.
I'd say that situation is representative of a very apropos mentality from a very apropos entity... but this reaction to even mentioning that is the most telling signal on if there's actually willpower to make what they're advocating for happen on the ground.
Oh interesting, maybe I shouldn’t have included the examples. They’re just what I happen to be busying myself with. What I winkingly called an anti social site is an experiment to see if people with share their authentic self if there’s no particular “karma” to be gained. I am all for a thousand flowers, including older strains.
Ah, an example of ... sorry I had missed the intent. Yes it would be so nice to be back in the days where common sense ruled and relied less on side loading bs to scrape every user that arrived at a site. I have always enjoyed forums that didn't rank, didn't use likes... etcetera.
reply