Building my resume in a wysiwyg editor was an exercise in frustration. Formatting was inconsistent, they were only searchable from inside the editor and versioning was useless because diff had no meaning.
My markdown resume has its own problems but having this level of control has been a huge load off my mind.
Naive question but you could move all your stuff out of NASDAQ before the IPO right? The downside is that you'd have to keep it out of NASDAQ until SPCX is finished cratering it?
It make it more solidly clear how this really is an IPO for all 3 orgs: SpaceX, X, and xAI which helped me understand more of the video.
> The Launch segment posted $4.1 billion in revenue but a $657 million operating loss, driven by roughly $3 billion in Starship R&D — a deliberate strategic bet, not a distressed business.
All in all it reflects a ton of what the youtube video says though (I haven't finished the video though). It adds some color.
Hey can you share any papers you've published on both of these topics? My partner just finished her Master's thesis in a similar vein and in her direct conversations with farmers and they have seen similar frustrating dynamics using fertilizer in their fields. She would like to share your work with them.
I’ve come across this YouTube channel and found it interesting. But only as a lay person. I’d be interested if your partner found this content credible. https://youtube.com/@soilworksllc-gsrcalcium
It's hard to tell. There's no shortage of these types of questions, or people claiming to have the answers to them (like this guy). Reductionist Western science isn't amazing at understanding if these holistic thinkers are full of crap or not. Certainly some of his ilk are snake oil salesmen, and some are visionaries. I *tend to distrust the ones who are selling the solutions. I tend to trust farmers and farmer-researchers who are describing what they're seeing, but aren't selling anything.
A lot of people I know have used their Bio5 reactor and are pretty happy with it. It's hard to know what sort of effect applying compost extract has on agroecosystems, because these are complex systems and the tools we use to measure soils are fairly crude. But I know producers who have stopped using nitrogen fertilizers entirely, and are applying this extract instead.
If you're interested in soil health in general, and learning about what you can do on whatever land you might be managing (including a garden plot or a yard), an excellent starting resource is NRCS's soil health principles, https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/conservation-basics/soil/soil-heal.... If you are able to find ways to meet these principles in your context, that's like 80% of the battle. The rest will sort itself out. Or if you have more specific questions about other things these guys are schlepping, let me know and I can give you my two cents or point you towards more resources.
---
Definitely give a shout if you have more questions. I'm biased but she's great at this. You can find some contact info for me in my bio.
Ask any publisher and you will get a resounding "yes, it is very different." On average they're able to attribute about a 33% decrease (globally) in traffic to google's (or others') AI answers. [1]
You're right that there are competitors, but those competitors are doing the same thing: hoovering up content and then not giving anything back for it. There are deals in place for some of the largest publishers [2] [3], but that leaves a ton of content out in the cold. That's going to decrease the amount of content that's out there, which will decrease the quality of AI search. I don't know where that ends, but given how leveraged the economy is in AI it seems like a good idea for somebody to figure it out.
> If you don't use their sync service, all your vault files are local only, and there isn't any mysterious telemetry happening in the background.
I think the parent's point is that Obsidian could add any tracking they wanted and -- unless you're examining their TOS or your network closely -- you might never know. However:
> Obsidian's business model is just selling the sync subscription service. There's no ads component to incentivize data collection/tracking and pissing off their entire customer base.
And that to me seems deeply infused into Obsidian's entire culture. They built a community and they're not gonna mess that up. And like you say, if they do it's trivial to move one's markdown somewhere else.
I vaguely remember reading that they were in fear if being cancelled at that time, in part because of the popularity of Twin Peaks, so they decided to lampoon it a little bit. I can't find a reference to that but it'd be funny if true.
> 3. Half of restaurants in my area do not have non-QR code menus, they just don't.
Not knocking this list, the shit is real. But I just had a lovely imaginary conversation with a server asking them what they would recommend and then trying something brand new.
When I go to a restaurant that has QR-only menus, I won't make a scene about it, but it lowers the mental rating I give the place and I'm less likely to return.
Joke's on the server. The robot that will replace their job soon will be more than happy to regale you with any hallucinated information you would like about the subtleties of the menu.
> the existing Vaultwarden system relies on Bitwarden clients and therefore caries Bitwardens secure reputation is its main selling point.
I hope that this could be a starting point and not an end-point of Vaultwarden. It has gotten far on the shoulders of the Bitwarden giant. If it forked, would it have a large enough community to continue to carry that trust forward (including building new clients)? How much financial support would they need? Could they find a sponsor? It's a European project -- would the EU help fund it as a data sovereignty push?
Agreed, it would be great to have a fully open source solution, however I would be wary of it until it was audited and backed by secuirty professionals in the field.
My markdown resume has its own problems but having this level of control has been a huge load off my mind.
reply