> My understand of the usual common-sense interpretation is roughly "The actions that I take are supernatural, and are not a consequence of physical laws", which seems quite absurd to me, and I'd expect that to have very little support in the physics community.
I can't speak for the physics community, but most philosophers are ok with a purely physical being having free will.
I can't speak for the physics community, but most philosophers are ok with a purely physical being having free will.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/