I wouldn't assume that more specific instructions weren't given or implicit, even if the article doesn't mention them: the ruling came after unions' complaints, that surely were specific.
Also the list of what can be shipped is not based in what's useful, but in what would cause more trouble to stop than to allow, considering that both put lives in danger.
Also the list of what can be shipped is not based in what's useful, but in what would cause more trouble to stop than to allow, considering that both put lives in danger.