> The Supreme Court has already ruled that neither of those apply at the border. Nor does the 4th.
reply
This is an extremely overbroad generalization.
The supreme court may or may not rule that forcing someone to be surveilled by federal agents in order to travel by plane is unconstitutional, or it may not. And it may be right or wrong. My qualm is legal and moral.
> The Supreme Court has already ruled that neither of those apply at the border. Nor does the 4th. reply
This is an extremely overbroad generalization.
The supreme court may or may not rule that forcing someone to be surveilled by federal agents in order to travel by plane is unconstitutional, or it may not. And it may be right or wrong. My qualm is legal and moral.