> That argument is much harder to assert with something like DocuSign because it is unlikely DocuSign would put their business on the line to fake someone's signature.
This seems like the claim that the USG will be unlikely to put it's Military on the line so they won't leak any tank designs on discord.
Happy to concede that the CEO of DocuSign wouldn't do this but surely some 15$/h employee doesn't have that same opinion.
The support person should not have that kind of access without auditability and traceability. Even Sundar should not be able to log into a console and read your emails either.
Someone implied that counterfeiting a sig or altering one, etc. was just as easy in Docusign as it would be with on on-site one-party controlled system. It just isn't.
This seems like the claim that the USG will be unlikely to put it's Military on the line so they won't leak any tank designs on discord.
Happy to concede that the CEO of DocuSign wouldn't do this but surely some 15$/h employee doesn't have that same opinion.