Not in this specific case, they agreed to those terms when signing up for a Disney+ account, this extension only helps with regular consent pop-ups.

What would've helped is not signing up to Disney+ and pirating all of their content instead.

Is there even a Disney defense here? Lawyers can bring all kinds of arguments, what matters is if they are upheld. Note that in this case Disney didn't even own or operate the restaurant so it's questionable why they even are a defendant here.