i don't understand. heterosexual women are way down the list. what are you trying to say? (i haven't seen the film so perhaps i am missing something, but i thought the argument from the original comment was that being a sexually active woman wasn't a major risk factor).
She was a promiscuous drug user. Sharing needles, engaging in high risk sexual activity, etc. The original comment is saying that they were annoyed that the movie perpetuated the stereotype that these activities increase the chances of contracting HIV. Those of us that are annoyed by this person's annoyance are saying that indeed these behaviors are scientifically proven to increase risk of HIV infection.
