Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wikipedia notability tag:

If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged or deleted.

How long does an article have to correct itself before the deletionists have their way with it? It seems to me that when plenty of reasonable people agree that someone is notable, and the problem is external links vs. reference citations, the {{Notability}} tag isn't the best way to highlight this and in fact is distracting in a destructive way.



How is a tag destructive? It is, for what it's worth, plainly obvious that the article needs improvement.

Stop taking tags personally. They're about the project, not about the subject.


The tag encourages users to delete the article rather than fix problems. That is the point. It is not personal.


That's precisely what the tag doesn't do. If you want to encourage people to delete the article, you put it up for AfD.


Then why not remove the warning saying "this article is likely to be merged or deleted"?

"Does not meet notability guidelines, please help fix" is not the same as "Does not meet notability guidelines, help fix or this article gets deleted." The latter frames the issue as content not permitted, the former frames the issue as content yet to come. The difference is significant.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: